My opinion is that this was probably faked. Unless if the animators were given uncensored footage to lip sync, then it was more likely wiped of the hard-drives that contained them.
Nah there's loads of fake clips of SB characters swearing on Youtube that haven't been taken down so the fact that Viacom went this far says they are real.
My opinion is that this was probably faked. Unless if the animators were given uncensored footage to lip sync, then it was more likely wiped of the hard-drives that contained them.
Nah there's loads of fake clips of SB characters swearing on Youtube that haven't been taken down so the fact that Viacom went this far says they are real.
Do we know if that actually was Paramount and not someone posing as Paramount? Also there are YouTube uploads of the clips still up. And it's way easier to take something down from YouTube so what gives? Also, I'm pretty sure IA has auto copyright detection, it probably saw "SpongeBob" and struck it down automatically.
Last Edit: Apr 13, 2024 22:17:49 GMT by YoshiKiller2S
Post by YoshiKiller2S on Apr 13, 2024 22:07:02 GMT
Here are the reasons why I think it's fake:
1. Why is it just this clip and not the full episode? 2. Why is this clip of the final episode? It's clearly from a DVD or Web DL and not from an animatic or Workprint. 3. Why is the uncensored audio mixed into the final sound mix with sound effects? Like, it's not a rough mix or anything it's the full one final audio.
If anyone is claiming the clips were from the gigaleak (which I was told it wasn't anywhere near a gigaleak in terms of size, unless that has since changed), then that is false. The source that showed them to me originally said they weren't from that leak and were from a different group of files. I don't know where or how they were obtained but it wasn't anything related to the publicized leaks we all have heard about.
As for the proof of email takedowns, there was also a screenshot that someone sent to me showing that Paramount had taken down their posting of the clips on X, which blew my mind because I had never seen something like that happen before. This was someone who told me about the whole thing back in October. Is it easy to falsely claim content on archive.org or X? The only other option would have been if they faked the takedowns themselves. And in that case, it would mean that this was some hugely coordinated troll,
For that to have happened, people from the server where the clips originated from would have had to perfectly copy the structure of a known workprint (Nasty Patty), sent me the screenshots and clips knowing I'd believe the story, intentionally held off on releasing them publicly for months, then had bondi and the other guy act as a pawns and sabotage themselves by faking Paramount takedown emails, from two different sites.
I guess that's not impossible, but it comes down to two options-
-These are real clips that were from the recording session and were found in a workprint from a lesser known Nick source -The entire existence of these is based on a months long, extremely well coordinated hoax that nobody can definitively prove
I just can't believe they're fake when everything is considered. And not that it matters but the "dumpster writing" clip from the same source uses a temporary voice and sounds a lot like one of the fish from the episode in my opinion. I guess that's not really good evidence though, I'm sure there would be some people who think it doesn't sounds similar.
Nah there's loads of fake clips of SB characters swearing on Youtube that haven't been taken down so the fact that Viacom went this far says they are real.
Do we know if that actually was Paramount and not someone posing as Paramount? Also there are YouTube uploads of the clips still up. And it's way easier to take something down from YouTube so what gives? Also, I'm pretty sure IA has auto copyright detection, it probably saw "SpongeBob" and struck it down automatically.
No it was definitely them cause they got taken down from Internet Archive as well and you can't just pose as a corporation on there like you can on Youtube.
Do we know if that actually was Paramount and not someone posing as Paramount? Also there are YouTube uploads of the clips still up. And it's way easier to take something down from YouTube so what gives? Also, I'm pretty sure IA has auto copyright detection, it probably saw "SpongeBob" and struck it down automatically.
No it was definitely them cause they got taken down from Internet Archive as well and you can't just pose as a corporation on there like you can on Youtube.
..just to play Devil's Advocate, maybe they got taken down because Paramount unquestionably owns the copyright to the visuals regardless of whether the audio was fake?
_alexpine_ on discord. 2018 was HOW many years ago?!?! 2 correct unidentified/lost media solves out of my probably hundreds of bad guesses isn't THAT bad of a track record, right?
No it was definitely them cause they got taken down from Internet Archive as well and you can't just pose as a corporation on there like you can on Youtube.
..just to play Devil's Advocate, maybe they got taken down because Paramount unquestionably owns the copyright to the visuals regardless of whether the audio was fake?
I tried uploading a fake Toy Story workprint on Internet Archive with no audio, and it got token down. It most likely got token down for the visuals.
No it was definitely them cause they got taken down from Internet Archive as well and you can't just pose as a corporation on there like you can on Youtube.
..just to play Devil's Advocate, maybe they got taken down because Paramount unquestionably owns the copyright to the visuals regardless of whether the audio was fake?
Guessing you missed LSSQ's post explaining why it's incredibly unlikely it's fake.
Guessing you missed LSSQ's post explaining why it's incredibly unlikely it's fake.
I feel like this is like, the third time this week you've assumed I haven't read something properly just because I disagree with you. Do you just not like me, like, as a person? Is that the issue?
I didn't even say that it was probably fake, I just said that the fact that it was taken down is not conclusive evidence that it's real, and I feel like ModWalletGuy's post also corroborates that point.
_alexpine_ on discord. 2018 was HOW many years ago?!?! 2 correct unidentified/lost media solves out of my probably hundreds of bad guesses isn't THAT bad of a track record, right?
If the voice actors were told to make up fake swears, but then decided to actually say the words. Then there's a big fat chance that the lines were different in some takes, so this couldn't even be the one used in the episode.