Post by LSuperSonicQ on Apr 13, 2024 22:35:20 GMT
If anyone is claiming the clips were from the gigaleak (which I was told it wasn't anywhere near a gigaleak in terms of size, unless that has since changed), then that is false. The source that showed them to me originally said they weren't from that leak and were from a different group of files. I don't know where or how they were obtained but it wasn't anything related to the publicized leaks we all have heard about.
As for the proof of email takedowns, there was also a screenshot that someone sent to me showing that Paramount had taken down their posting of the clips on X, which blew my mind because I had never seen something like that happen before. This was someone who told me about the whole thing back in October. Is it easy to falsely claim content on archive.org or X? The only other option would have been if they faked the takedowns themselves. And in that case, it would mean that this was some hugely coordinated troll,
For that to have happened, people from the server where the clips originated from would have had to perfectly copy the structure of a known workprint (Nasty Patty), sent me the screenshots and clips knowing I'd believe the story, intentionally held off on releasing them publicly for months, then had bondi and the other guy act as a pawns and sabotage themselves by faking Paramount takedown emails, from two different sites.
I guess that's not impossible, but it comes down to two options-
-These are real clips that were from the recording session and were found in a workprint from a lesser known Nick source
-The entire existence of these is based on a months long, extremely well coordinated hoax that nobody can definitively prove
I just can't believe they're fake when everything is considered. And not that it matters but the "dumpster writing" clip from the same source uses a temporary voice and sounds a lot like one of the fish from the episode in my opinion. I guess that's not really good evidence though, I'm sure there would be some people who think it doesn't sounds similar.
As for the proof of email takedowns, there was also a screenshot that someone sent to me showing that Paramount had taken down their posting of the clips on X, which blew my mind because I had never seen something like that happen before. This was someone who told me about the whole thing back in October. Is it easy to falsely claim content on archive.org or X? The only other option would have been if they faked the takedowns themselves. And in that case, it would mean that this was some hugely coordinated troll,
For that to have happened, people from the server where the clips originated from would have had to perfectly copy the structure of a known workprint (Nasty Patty), sent me the screenshots and clips knowing I'd believe the story, intentionally held off on releasing them publicly for months, then had bondi and the other guy act as a pawns and sabotage themselves by faking Paramount takedown emails, from two different sites.
I guess that's not impossible, but it comes down to two options-
-These are real clips that were from the recording session and were found in a workprint from a lesser known Nick source
-The entire existence of these is based on a months long, extremely well coordinated hoax that nobody can definitively prove
I just can't believe they're fake when everything is considered. And not that it matters but the "dumpster writing" clip from the same source uses a temporary voice and sounds a lot like one of the fish from the episode in my opinion. I guess that's not really good evidence though, I'm sure there would be some people who think it doesn't sounds similar.