This is genuinely awesome, i wonder if there’s more of the movies with footage akin to this out there.
Let me try to do a quick rundown of uncut footage here:
Part 1 was never lost; I think it popped up on a few odd foreign releases for whatever reason. But regardless, the original negative was still in Paramount's possession, and a full 4K scan was reintegrated into the film.
Part 2 exists as a fullscreen, first generation tape copy, albeit silent.
Part 3 is completely lost.
Part 4 is completely lost, although interestingly there's a bunch of silent outtakes and a deleted ending that were discovered (not part of the uncut film, however).
Part 5 is completely lost.
Part 6 exists as a tape copy (don't know of the origins, but its clarity suggests an early generation).
Part 7 exists as workprint footage. The tape is extremely worn from years of play, and the final soundtrack is not in place.
Part 8 is completely lost.
From the New Line films onwards, there was a better effort taken to preserve the uncut versions of the films; Jason Goes to Hell got an uncut release promptly on home video. When it comes to deleted content from these films, it's probably still out there.
”Part 2 exists as a fullscreen, first generation tape copy, albeit silent.”
Other than the Mrs. Voorhees scene yes, that is still lost.
To clarify, my post refers to the uncut versions of the films, not scenes that were voluntarily excised by the director. The Part 2 tape contains all the footage cut by the MPAA.
Other than the Mrs. Voorhees scene yes, that is still lost.
To clarify, my post refers to the uncut versions of the films, not scenes that were voluntarily excised by the director. The Part 2 tape contains all the footage cut by the MPAA.
Worse than that, Paramount ordered it to be destroyed in the 90s. Makes the job of finding copies or surviving film that much more daunting.
Was there a specific reason why they ordered the footage to be destroyed? It's a travesty that things turned out the way they did. Also, didn't something similar happen with the Halloween movies and the violence in the later sequels or am I recalling that wrong?
To clarify, my post refers to the uncut versions of the films, not scenes that were voluntarily excised by the director. The Part 2 tape contains all the footage cut by the MPAA.
Worse than that, Paramount ordered it to be destroyed in the 90s. Makes the job of finding copies or surviving film that much more daunting.
Was there a specific reason why they ordered the footage to be destroyed? It's a travesty that things turned out the way they did. Also, didn't something similar happen with the Halloween movies and the violence in the later sequels or am I recalling that wrong?
You might be thinking of The Curse Of Michael Myers which had an alternate producers cut with multiple changes and less violence which finally got officially released a few years ago.
Was there a specific reason why they ordered the footage to be destroyed? It's a travesty that things turned out the way they did. Also, didn't something similar happen with the Halloween movies and the violence in the later sequels or am I recalling that wrong?
You might be thinking of The Curse Of Michael Myers which had an alternate producers cut with multiple changes and less violence which finally got officially released a few years ago.
Okay, that was the one then. For some reason, I thought 4-6 had this problem.
Was there a specific reason why they ordered the footage to be destroyed? It's a travesty that things turned out the way they did. Also, didn't something similar happen with the Halloween movies and the violence in the later sequels or am I recalling that wrong?
The Friday the 13th movies were an embarrassment to Paramount in the 80s. They made money, but being horror movies, they were something the studio heads weren’t proud of.
Without knowing officially, the reason could have been something as mundane as needing to clear shelf space. This would happen a lot in film archives. Happening as late as the 1990s is a worry given the Laserdisc market (and DVD by 1995) meant the release of special features, unrated and deleted for home media buyers.
The other factor could be a policy Paramount may of had about unrated and NC-17 films. If the trims were included again, the film still would not have passed with an R rating. When it came to horror, the studios were careful not to piss off conservative retailers at the like Wall-Mart and Blockbuster that didn’t carry NC-17 films.
Independent studios like New Line Cinema were a bit more cool about the home media market, which is why Jason Goes To Hell was released with “R” rated and “Unrated” versions on home video.
Paramount was a big studio more interested their next mega budget mainstream film and thought that no one would care about these films in the future, which is the misguided logic of “the adults” that has seen the distraction of most lost media through the decades (Just ask a Dr Who fan). Not only sort sighted, out right stupid.
Last Edit: Oct 17, 2023 21:00:57 GMT by paulisdead