Physical media refers to the physical materials that are used to transmit information in data communications. It is referred to as physical media because the media is generally a physical object such as copper or glass. It can be touched and felt, and has physical properties such as weight and color.
media - the main means of mass communication (broadcasting, publishing, and the Internet), regarded collectively.
The discussion is still more than welcome though, we just aren't allowed to make an article for it (which I would love to, just to raise awareness and stuff).
Physical media refers to the physical materials that are used to transmit information in data communications. It is referred to as physical media because the media is generally a physical object such as copper or glass. It can be touched and felt, and has physical properties such as weight and color.
media - the main means of mass communication (broadcasting, publishing, and the Internet), regarded collectively.
The discussion is still more than welcome though, we just aren't allowed to make an article for it (which I would love to, just to raise awareness and stuff).
Physical media refers to the physical materials that are used to transmit information in data communications. It is referred to as physical media because the media is generally a physical object such as copper or glass. It can be touched and felt, and has physical properties such as weight and color.
media - the main means of mass communication (broadcasting, publishing, and the Internet), regarded collectively.
The discussion is still more than welcome though, we just aren't allowed to make an article for it (which I would love to, just to raise awareness and stuff).
Also, wouldn't games that are inside those little lcd arcade cabinets not count either, because it's mostly the physical part of it that counts? Such as the 9/11 lcd game. It's just one game that's in multiple other lcd games, but this one is special because it has Osama on it. That's entirely physical.
videogamemm.com/main/content/auction-crawler-i-told-you-mallow-exists Mallow is proven to exist. Geno is still unknown, I have heard only 2 Mallow plushes exist.. But why? My theory is that since Mario RPG was such a different game, The company was afraid he would not sell so to save materials they stopped production.
So that's when I was all like, that's not a Camel, that's my wife!
I searched "Squaresoft" on Google and Twitter and had no luck, Google says square soft is now square Enix, but i cannot find any info on whether they have created plushes before. Please Help Me Search
-Cess
So that's when I was all like, that's not a Camel, that's my wife!
I searched "Squaresoft" on Google and Twitter and had no luck, Google says square soft is now square Enix, but i cannot find any info on whether they have created plushes before. Please Help Me Search
videogamemm.com/main/content/auction-crawler-i-told-you-mallow-exists Mallow is proven to exist. Geno is still unknown, I have heard only 2 Mallow plushes exist.. But why? My theory is that since Mario RPG was such a different game, The company was afraid he would not sell so to save materials they stopped production.
Yeah, me and Radiant are members of the VGMM; we held our own little search there, to no avail.
The sad thing is, the person who sold the second one on Yahoo Japan listed a little blurb on the auction which roughly translated to "Thing was fished at the time UFO catcher (Japan's claw machine)"; if only we contacted him at the time we could've asked if there were more characters in the set, but the auction is gone; the link leads to an empty page, so that lead is dead.
There is a theory this plush was a lottery prize (something auctioned at convenience stores in Japan at the time), explaining its rarity, but that is just as speculative as anything else.
Also somone here talked about contacting TOMY, the creator of this set was SquareSoft and i will try to find contact with them after i post this
Well Square made the game with Nintendo; Tomy made the actual plushes.
I'm actually not the most well-versed in this stuff, but I'm pretty sure the company we actually want to contact is Takara Tomy. The only thing I was ever able to do was email them (which they didn't have any information); I believe I also PM'd their YouTube channel. The final frontier is their Facebook page.
The sad thing is, this is a step further than Clock Man which was a step further than Cracks, but people don't give two f***s about it because it isn't media. Like this is actually something that would benefit from digital "Have you seen me?" pictures because of the language barrier. If we actually wanted to take this on, it would involve somehow crossing over into the Japanese world. All we can do is reflect on the failed chance to contact the Yahoo Japan seller.
Essentially the two battles are "Who were all the characters in the set?" and "What is up with Mallow? Why is he so rare/is he a custom?"; I would completely dispel the theory of Mallow being a custom since he had the golden loop on his head (so the plushes were easier to hook), though in the two different pictures it looks like his pants were made out of a different material or something, but once again, I don't think we should go into this search assuming he is a custom.
♪ Good day, good day, I'm glad you came my way... ♪
We said that the set was made by TOMY? it wasn't it was made by Takara!!! if we can somehow contact them we can find out if they have a set sheet!! I'll jump to Twitter!!!
So that's when I was all like, that's not a Camel, that's my wife!
videogamemm.com/main/content/auction-crawler-i-told-you-mallow-exists Mallow is proven to exist. Geno is still unknown, I have heard only 2 Mallow plushes exist.. But why? My theory is that since Mario RPG was such a different game, The company was afraid he would not sell so to save materials they stopped production.
Yeah, me and Radiant are members of the VGMM; we held our own little search there, to no avail.
The sad thing is, the person who sold the second one on Yahoo Japan listed a little blurb on the auction which roughly translated to "Thing was fished at the time UFO catcher (Japan's claw machine)"; if only we contacted him at the time we could've asked if there were more characters in the set, but the auction is gone; the link leads to an empty page, so that lead is dead.
There is a theory this plush was a lottery prize (something auctioned at convenience stores in Japan at the time), explaining its rarity, but that is just as speculative as anything else.
Also somone here talked about contacting TOMY, the creator of this set was SquareSoft and i will try to find contact with them after i post this
Well Square made the game with Nintendo; Tomy made the actual plushes.
I'm actually not the most well-versed in this stuff, but I'm pretty sure the company we actually want to contact is Takara Tomy. The only thing I was ever able to do was email them (which they didn't have any information); I believe I also PM'd their YouTube channel. The final frontier is their Facebook page.
The sad thing is, this is a step further than Clock Man which was a step further than Cracks, but people don't give two f***s about it because it isn't media. Like this is actually something that would benefit from digital "Have you seen me?" pictures because of the language barrier. If we actually wanted to take this on, it would involve somehow crossing over into the Japanese world. All we can do is reflect on the failed chance to contact the Yahoo Japan seller.
Essentially the two battles are "Who were all the characters in the set?" and "What is up with Mallow? Why is he so rare/is he a custom?"; I would completely dispel the theory of Mallow being a custom since he had the golden loop on his head (so the plushes were easier to hook), though in the two different pictures it looks like his pants were made out of a different material or something, but once again, I don't think we should go into this search assuming he is a custom.
Is it possible to use the wayback machine to get to the auction and find the seller?
So that's when I was all like, that's not a Camel, that's my wife!
We said that the set was made by TOMY? it wasn't it was made by Takara!!! if we can somehow contact them we can find out if they have a set sheet!! I'll jump to Twitter!!!
We need someone to clarify Tomy vs. Takara Tomy. I honestly believe they're the same thing, Takara is just pure Japan.
A lost media bounty has been set on "theyellowmonkey1984"! Let's do this! The language barrier will make this difficult, but we'll go down fighting!
Here is a thread where we talk about this on a site called the Video Game Memorabilia Museum. I'm sure someone there knows their way around Yahoo Japan Auctions and can message the seller.
♪ Good day, good day, I'm glad you came my way... ♪
The first post claims the plushies were made by Banpresto (now part of Bandai Namco). Then someone claims it was Squaresoft (now Square Enix), who also developed the game. Now we're onto Takara Tomy. Which is it? Those are three very separate companies. FWIW, Takara Tomy as an entity didn't exist until like 2006. Before then, they were separate companies: Takara and Tomy. Both made toys. I have no idea which made plush.
I also don't think you're going to get a lot of answers from these companies. These plushies were made 20+ years ago. How many people do you think are still around from those days and would answer a customer support message?
If I remember correctly dycaite told me physical objects do not count as lost media. But if you say so :3
Yes, I believe for some reason our forum doesn't consider objects as media. It would open up a lot of doors here, though. I was going by the definition.
How would "lost" physical objects qualify to be found? Say I bought these plushies, how does that change the fact that you and everyone else won't have access to them? If a video game museum filled with Mario tchotchkes bought them, how does that change the fact that you won't touch them and unless you live close, wouldn't see them in person? It doesn't. To you, they'd be as "lost" as they currently are, i.e. limited to photos and descriptions. Books, movies, music, songs, video games, etc. can be duplicated and distributed to people with relative ease. To share a physical object, like a toy or a plush, would require them to be recreated. Few individuals have the resources to do something like that, nevermind the fact that any recreation wouldn't be the original "lost" object in question and be subject to litigation.
Feel free to make an "Obscure Objects" Wiki or something, but these kinds of things aren't lost media.
The first post claims the plushies were made by Banpresto (now part of Bandai Namco). Then someone claims it was Squaresoft (now Square Enix), who also developed the game. Now we're onto Takara Tomy. Which is it? Those are three very separate companies. FWIW, Takara Tomy as an entity didn't exist until like 2006. Before then, they were separate companies: Takara and Tomy. Both made toys. I have no idea which made plush.
I also don't think you're going to get a lot of answers from these companies. These plushies were made 20+ years ago. How many people do you think are still around from those days and would answer a customer support message?
Yes, I believe for some reason our forum doesn't consider objects as media. It would open up a lot of doors here, though. I was going by the definition.
How would "lost" physical objects qualify to be found? Say I bought these plushies, how does that change the fact that you and everyone else won't have access to them? If a video game museum filled with Mario tchotchkes bought them, how does that change the fact that you won't touch them and unless you live close, wouldn't see them in person? It doesn't. To you, they'd be as "lost" as they currently are, i.e. limited to photos and descriptions. Books, movies, music, songs, video games, etc. can be duplicated and distributed to people with relative ease. To share a physical object, like a toy or a plush, would require them to be recreated. Few individuals have the resources to do something like that, nevermind the fact that any recreation wouldn't be the original "lost" object in question and be subject to litigation.
Feel free to make an "Obscure Objects" Wiki or something, but these kinds of things aren't lost media.
Okay, so it's just Takara, so unless we contact the seller and ask them if there were any other characters in the set we'll never know.
I totally agree these aren't lost media (and it blows my mind when people say plushes and toys are media -- did you go to school?), but it's in the spirit of lost media, so who cares?
♪ Good day, good day, I'm glad you came my way... ♪
In the case of Geno, we don't actually know if he's real. So the "search" is to actually find proof that he was created as a physical item, which I would group into the existence unconfirmed category because we're looking for a picture which is media. Whether or not people want to accept that is their thing.
As for the lead...wow, I'm shocked that actually worked! Though I doubt he'll be able to tell us much more, this is definitely better than nothing.
Also we did have the link for that right? Cause I was hoping to locate the O'Hare listing in the same way....but that link is long gone.