Post by Azuki<3 on Oct 7, 2023 17:15:44 GMT
But that does not mean Allen agrees with Petersen. In “most of the books [she challenged], we do not agree with her assessment, because ... you cannot base the merit of a book on just its parts,” Allen said. “She is weighing the whole book on single passages.”
AND this, this is exactly what I'm talking about when I mention "context." What's more "threatening" to youth mental health- consuming random teenage shooter "shock videos" they find randomly on the internet vs. reading about a school shooting in a book that discusses the psychology, sociology, possible motivations, the victims, the historical background, etc. Not saying all nonfiction books are this enlightening, but they provide context to "shocking" or "disturbing" ideas that makes it easier to discuss and digest said ideas.
Your dad sounds similar to mine, he's conservative but he has a lot of books and he's always encouraged me to read.
Certain topics have always been more taboo to discuss in schools, and whatever books were studied probably just fell in line with that. And certain communities probably just never advertised that they banned books, or teachers just declined to teach with whatever they feared the community would shame them over. Didn't mean it wasn't happening of course.