The article about the "second" filming of JFK's assassination (there were more than two people filming the incident, but that's beside the point) seems to be talking about the original physical film rather than the footage itself. The footage is not lost, nor has it ever been, as many copies have been made over the years, in addition to being uploaded online, in full. Given this, wouldn't this not count as lost media, as we can still watch it in full?
The article about the "second" filming of JFK's assassination (there were more than two people filming the incident, but that's beside the point) seems to be talking about the original physical film rather than the footage itself. The footage is not lost, nor has it ever been, as many copies have been made over the years, in addition to being uploaded online, in full. Given this, wouldn't this not count as lost media, as we can still watch it in full?
The film itself isn't lost either as it's within government hands. The article should just be deleted.
The article about the "second" filming of JFK's assassination (there were more than two people filming the incident, but that's beside the point) seems to be talking about the original physical film rather than the footage itself. The footage is not lost, nor has it ever been, as many copies have been made over the years, in addition to being uploaded online, in full. Given this, wouldn't this not count as lost media, as we can still watch it in full?
The film itself isn't lost either as it's within government hands. The article should just be deleted.
I second that motion. Any admins watching, what say you?