Hey, Somebody created an account here, and in their registration message they said we don't need to approve their account since they only wanted us to pass this link on to you: rutracker.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6073504
This torrent seems to have a bunch of these. Hope this helps.
We try to change these when we notice them - feel free to report the threads and we can edit the titles where needed. I changed this one.
As of yesterday I started on the task of reorganizing the lost media section in the forum. In the subforums for search efforts, when they are added, we will definitely be more strict about requiring every thread to say what they're about in the title. That said it's going to take a while to sort every thread so this won't be immediate, but with any luck, it will still be ACTUALLY soon and not "Soon(tm)".
Hi. I saw the film as a child in 80s, and now I wanted to watch it. However, it immediately became clear that the film was lost and for a long time the film was looking for a lot of people. Recently created an English-language search progress page fluger.net
I would like to ask if the lostmediawiki community knows about the missing movie and does it have a dedicated page on this resource?
*as a child in the 80s.
Stop bumping threads to make pedantic grammar corrections if you have nothing else to add
Article Name: Léon le Caméléon (Lost French Cartoon; 1984) Edited?: (No) Categories: Lost cartoon, Lost animation, Completely lost media Summary: Entire article is plagiarised from its source, simply google translated from french. Link: lostmediawiki.com/L%C3%A9on_le_Cam%C3%A9l%C3%A9on_(Lost_French_Cartoon;_1984)
I would entirely rewrite the article, but i doubt i'm allowed to do so.
You're allowed to make any changes to an article that can reasonably viewed as improvements - i.e. don't rewrite a whole page that's already in good shape, but if something is poor quality to the point where the only way to fix it is to rewrite most or all of it, you are welcome to do so. That said, due to the plagiarism this article has been deleted (that's something we don't tolerate at all), so you'd have to really start over.
But I don't mean media requests. I mean actual media like the Most Mysterious Song on the Internet for example.
For this specifically, the song's not lost, so it would still go in unidentified media since people are trying to find the name of something rather than the thing itself
Linking to YouTube videos is fine. Linking to that specific footage, or any other footage illegally recorded at the Lost and Found event, is not. We were contacted by the people who ran the event telling us to stop hosting links to that content and we have enforced a ban on it since. You can find it elsewhere
It's tricky right now because, well, they are threads about the topic of lost media so the lost media section is the most logical place for them at the moment. That said, I have heard feedback that the forums could be better organized for finding search efforts, and that's something I can agree with. The staff are spitballing some ideas for forum reorganization right now, which will hopefully come to fruition sooner rather than later.
The thing with real-world events is that they themselves aren't media, but there can be media associated with them. If it's known that these musical performances were recorded, then the recordings would count as lost media. Additionally, the songs from these musicals (either studio versions, if they exist, or sheet music/lyrics etc) could be considered lost if they haven't resurfaced or been released anywhere. Same for the scripts. As for the performances themselves though, if there's no proof that they were recorded I would advise against making an article about theoretical recordings of them.
Good work on these! I'd say for the Wormholes page, my main advice is that if a section contains one very long paragraph it might be easier to read if it's split into two paragraphs instead. I edited it to do this for the Availability section. Also, I removed a subjective statement ("making it very hard to describe"). Last thing I'd say here is to try to include references that cover every claim made in a page - for instance, if it says that Nick Smith posted the video to r/obscuremedia, add the Reddit link as a reference there. I added this one.
For the Muppet page, there were a couple of capitalization issues that I fixed, and I also reworded the introduction, but otherwise great job!