Post by asexualanarchist on Apr 29, 2016 6:44:02 GMT
All of that is fan made stuff and none of it has to do with the lost movie. Plus we knew about that stuff sorry dude. (sorry if i seem like a jerk. i'm not trying to be)
Post by Mister E. Nigma on Apr 29, 2016 6:45:50 GMT
I'm looking into this and the whole thing is weird to creepy. Reagal Films is a seemingly real label. I don't know what the agenda of the company is. I've seen this where people are trying to look into a thing that shouldn't have been found. I haven't seen where use of a virus to repel any investigation. Becouse everything is public about this anyone can see what we're thinking. I don't understand why they're going to such lengths to protect something so obscure. My only thoughts is this was a campaign gone wrong and out of settlement Reagal Films cannot reveal any company secrets. But they could have easly just deleted evidence from their website.
All I can figure out the library is in Flemington, New Jersey. Its a small town. Goodwills are all over New Jersey but there's one Salvation Army in Flemintion. Reagal Films is located in Atlanta, Georgia.
All of that is fan made stuff and none of it has to do with the lost movie. Plus we knew about that stuff sorry dude. (sorry if i seem like a jerk. i'm not trying to be)
I have been trying for WEEKS to get more information out of that post. We discovered it a long time ago but never really looked into it.
Recently I made an account on the site and messaged the guy through email and on-site PM, but he ignored all of it.
We also tried to contact Amazon for information, and while I forget exactly what happened with that, the end result didn't yield any information.
I have a theory that Lorenzo was the one who listed it, and was trying to pass it off a "1 of 1 copy" so he could make a quick buck on a "collectible" SpongeBob item.
I have no reason to believe the listing was fake (because in 2013 nobody was looking for this movie, nonetheless for $3,000), nor do I believe the guy who posted that in the SBMania forums was trolling because he doesn't seem like someone who would. And maybe he isn't responding because as we've collectively theorized before, other groups thought to contact him first and now he's tired of answering messages about it.
This kinda reminds me of fullmetal alchemist when the main characters are finding information on homunculi and philosopher's stones, and in the end we end up like Maes Hughes, anyone remember that? Just replace the homunculi with Lorenzo and philosopher's stone with ADWSS, I'm kinda scared sometimes, because it seems surreal, like something that exists but no one knows about.
It looks like alot of Reagal movies are available on amazon one that is about steve jobs being free with prime lil waynes no ceilings documentary having a actor "lil waybe" listed
Post by Mister E. Nigma on Apr 30, 2016 6:17:52 GMT
I know I can get bothersome and annoying but from reading the reviews I think this DVD was intentionally given to thrift stores and planted at dollar stores and a copy was planted in the library. I think the film company made a deal with online retailers but because of legal reasons never realised the film. This is a truly creepy. Yeah, anyone can post whatever but the online reviewers wouldn't conspire in such away. I'm going to look into ALL the online reviewers.
I can see it being given to thrift stores, I can also imagine being given to 3rd world countries where viacom has no jurisdiction (or care)
This is what I mean when you go into a store or library the management only cares about what goes out they don't even think about stock being added. In a library you have say 10 to maybe 25 new materials coming in a month. Some donations others bought. In a library you could easily put a DVD on a shelf or a display. A stocker could have brought the unmarked DVD to the librarian's attention and got catalogued. If the DVD's in the library all someone has to do is go there and document it's existence. Libraries have DVD players. If it was taken out and never returned that could mean the film company made it disappear or someone stole it.
I can see it being given to thrift stores, I can also imagine being given to 3rd world countries where viacom has no jurisdiction (or care)
This is what I mean when you go into a store or library the management only cares about what goes out they don't even think about stock being added. In a library you have say 10 to maybe 25 new materials coming in a month. Some donations others bought. In a library you could easily put a DVD on a shelf or a display. A stocker could have brought the unmarked DVD to the librarian's attention and got catalogued. If the DVD's in the library all someone has to do is go there and document it's existence. Libraries have DVD players. If it was taken out and never returned that could mean the film company made it disappear or someone stole it.
Lamb We discovered from his other tweets around that time that he was confusing ADWSS with the real SpongeBob Movie.
@ Mister E. Nigma As someone who has been looking into this movie and the company behind it for a looooong time, the idea of copies being "planted" is pretty farfetched. The thing about Reagal films is they're in it for the money- we have theories the whole company is simply a front for money laundering. There's no way they would ever make movies with the intention of planting them or giving them away, and if for some strange reason they were, why have we not seen a legit copy of one by now given the immense attention this has brought to the internet?
Likewise, the reviews (on any website for that matter) are 100% fake- each and every one of them. Notice how not a single review is identical to one another- but radically different in detail? I'm not sure where you're reading someone got it in 2012, because the first review I see is November 2015. And again, if all these people who wrote reviews on it actually have the DVD as they claim, why haven't they uploaded it yet or shown some kind of proof since they clearly know about it's "rarity"?
Unless there is hard evidence suggesting otherwise, I personally don't think any of these ideas are accurate.
Last Edit: Apr 30, 2016 18:43:29 GMT by LSuperSonicQ