I'm offended that you'd think I'm ''Full of Shit''. What exactly makes you think that, then? What evidence do you have?
If John is your cousin, and you called John's cousin, the legal guy, that would make the legal guy your cousin. You called your cousin and asked if he was your cousins cousin. And you don't know your cousin's ("the legal guy") name? Are you fucking kidding me? I'm calling bullshit.
The legal guy isn't anyone's cousin. I have no idea where you got any of that.
Understand that we've had quite the handful of new users join the thread and post "new information and leads", only to find out a short while later that they were trolls.
I'm not one to blatantly attack straight out of the gate, but typing out the entire conversation that you've had with two different people over the course of two different days just seems a little forced to some of us.
And masking people's names and not providing real proof that these are legitimate people doesn't help your case. While I understand that you might not be happy with that mentality, (and I can't really blame you for not wanting to reveal actual names), unfortunately with the popularity of the search that's just the way things are and everything has to be taken with a grain of salt.
Last Edit: Apr 26, 2016 2:08:11 GMT by LSuperSonicQ
Understand that we've had quite the handful of new users join the thread and post "new information and leads", only to find out a short while later that they were trolls.
I'm not one to blatantly attack straight out of the gate, but typing out the entire conversation that you've had with two different people over the course of two different days just seems a little forced to some of us.
And masking people's names and not providing real proof that these are legitimate people doesn't help your case. While I understand that you might not be happy with that mentality, but unfortunately with the popularity of the search that's just the way things are.
That's understandable. I realize that people aren't always going to trust some random guy who just logged into the site a couple days ago. I'm sorry if I was overreacting a bit in my other quotes.
If John is your cousin, and you called John's cousin, the legal guy, that would make the legal guy your cousin. You called your cousin and asked if he was your cousins cousin. And you don't know your cousin's ("the legal guy") name? Are you fucking kidding me? I'm calling bullshit.
The legal guy isn't anyone's cousin. I have no idea where you got any of that.
oh dang sorry man. I read the conversation wrong. I'll take your story with a itty bitty teeny tiny grain of salt though because we've had so many trolls before that I'm very skeptic. The only way you can convince me that this story is true is proof, which you don't seem to have.
The legal guy isn't anyone's cousin. I have no idea where you got any of that.
oh dang sorry man. I read the conversation wrong. I'll take your story with a itty bitty teeny tiny grain of salt though because we've had so many trolls before that I'm very skeptic. The only way you can convince me that this story is true is proof, which you don't seem to have.
What sort of proof do you have in mind? I'll try to get whatever it is you my need.
oh dang sorry man. I read the conversation wrong. I'll take your story with a itty bitty teeny tiny grain of salt though because we've had so many trolls before that I'm very skeptic. The only way you can convince me that this story is true is proof, which you don't seem to have.
What sort of proof do you have in mind? I'll try to get whatever it is you my need.
Proof that your cousin used to work at Nick, recordings of the call would've been nice
Rhen the cops will arrest them... And then our chances will become zero.
Not necessarily. While the movie along with many others would be taken into police evidence, it's possible that it could be played during their court trial. The police could also release evidence to the press. They've don so in the past.
Then again, Toronto police still have a video of Rob Ford smoking crack and they still haven't released it to the public. It's possible they aren't going to release it out of respect for his family since Ford died last month.
After taking a look at all of the information summed up in some recent videos by the Lost Media Chronicles and Bedhead Bernie, I've come up with a theory that could answer some questions about Reagal and it's members.
Reagal and Foy Foods are money laundering fronts for some type of sex business that Lorenzo Holley aka Riley T. Markowitz is running out of New York and maybe other places as well.
Foy Foods looks like a front because of the duplicate pages on it's site regarding a scam, porn, and dating in the U.K. It's also possible that there site was hacked as well. But you have to ask yourself, "Both of Lorenzo Holley's sites have trouble written all over them. One is tries to install a Trojan virus onto your computer, (Reagal), the other has a bunch of hidden pages, (Foy Foods). To me, these seems to be very odd coincidences. Also, why doesn't Lorenzo pay more attention to what's happening to his sites? Does he care? I believe someone who's trying to launder money wouldn't.
Now why is Lorenzo Holley being uncooperative with us? It's possible that while making ADWSS that he was threatened with legal action by Nickelodeon and Viacom. If he gets sued by one or either, his money laundering schemes could be exposed. It's possible that if he does release the movie now, the same thing could happen. He gets sued and caught laundering money for a sex business. So maybe he along with the other members of Reagal think that by keeping quiet about this movie, they don't run a greater risk of being caught.
I SUPPORT THIS!
What part do you support? The theory or the business?
