Should I make an article for a missing LEGO instruction page

We are way too stringent about what is considered "media" seeing as the actual definition of media is broader than what we allow. Why do we want these things to become lost just because they do not fit into an arbitrary definition set up by a few people?I think at some point I'll set up a site similar to the Lost Media Wiki and Forums for unconventional media. That way, we can make sure unconventional media such as instructions, recipes, dubs, YouTube videos, etc., don't become lost, without this stuff spilling into the regular Lost Media Wiki and Forums. What do you guys think?

I think you... uh mistyped a bit.

But anyways,  that is a good idea, but YT videos do in fact count. As long as the media falls under video, movie, software, and things around that category it counts. Images do not count I believe, but I'll have to look into that a bit more. If that is correct, I don't know why a lego page wouldn't count. Edit: These are the main sections in the wikia. But interestingly, "test cards" has a page on there. I know we don't have a lot of moderators, so it could just be that, but a test card is just an image, which I would think would not count. Maybe I am incorrect.
I forgot that YouTube videos do count, but I do wonder why test cards would and not Lego construction pages.